blog article

Hack Reactor vs MakerSquare: Your Ultimate Guide

Imogen Crispe

Written By Imogen Crispe

Last updated on April 11, 2016

Course Report strives to create the most trust-worthy content about coding bootcamps. Read more about Course Report’s Editorial Policy and How We Make Money.

hack-reactor-vs-makersquare-versus

MakerSquare and Hack Reactor are two well-reputed, full-time coding bootcamps which teach full stack JavaScript. In January 2015, Hack Reactor acquired MakerSquare, and it became part of the Reactor Core network of schools. While MakerSquare continues to operate independently, the curriculum has changed slightly to better align with the other Reactor Core schools. Because of the overlap in curriculum and leadership, making a decision between MakerSquare vs. Hack Reactor can be daunting; our comparison will dive into the intricacies and subtle differences between the two coding bootcamps.

Focus & History   

MakerSquare has been through an evolution over the last three years. The school was started by Harsh Patel, Shehzan Devani, and Shaan Shah in 2013 in Austin, Texas, as a Ruby on Rails and JavaScript coding bootcamp. In June 2014, MakerSquare opened a new campus in San Francisco, and in December 2014, the school shifted its curriculum to teach JavaScript. In January 2015, MakerSquare was acquired and joined Reactor Core – the network which now includes Hack Reactor, Hack Reactor Remote Beta, Telegraph Academy, and Mobile Makers Academy. In June 2015, MakerSquare opened their Los Angeles campus and is set to open a New York campus on May 31, 2016.

Hack Reactor was founded as a JavaScript coding bootcamp by Anthony Phillips, Shawn Drost, Marcus Phillips, and Douglas Calhoun in 2012, and since then has built a very established reputation. The co-founders wanted to “start the best school in the world for software engineers” and be “the CS degree of the 21st century.” From the start, Hack Reactor has been highly selective – in 2013 they were only accepting one student for every 30, and they are still selective today.

Other differences between the two coding bootcamps are that Hack Reactor offers a Remote Beta program, for students who want to complete the whole course online, and MakerSquare offers the Masters beta program, an advanced 8-week course for experienced developers. Co-founder Shawn Drost also pointed out that MakerSquare has a dev house in Austin, and Hack Reactor has an Alumni Lounge in San Francisco.

Cost & Location

MakerSquare: $16,920. The price has increased since 2014 when it was $13,880. It is the same price in all locations – Austin, San Francisco and Los Angeles.

Hack Reactor: $17,780. The price has not changed since 2013. Hack Reactor’s campus is in San Francisco.

Time Commitment

Both coding bootcamp programs are 12 weeks full time onsite. They have the same hours: 9am to 8pm, Monday to Saturday.

Pre-Work Requirements

Both MakerSquare and Hack Reactor require pre-work before starting the in-person course.

MakerSquare: 100 hours remote

  • This must be completed in order for a student to start the in-person class.

Hack Reactor: 8 weeks part time remote

  • The school estimates it will take students 50 to 80 hours to complete the work.
  • Covers JavaScript fundamentals

Curriculum

Hack Reactor and MakerSquare employ the same curriculum, which focuses on full stack JavaScript, but MakerSquare makes small modifications to suit each of their locations. Technologies taught at both schools include JavaScript plus Node.js, jQuery, Angular.js, MongoDB, Express, and more.

MakerSquare students also have access to the school’s old Ruby on Rails curriculum while they are there, although this will not be taught.

Hack Reactor describes the curriculum as being designed to mimic a real job environment, with a focus on how to learn any new technologies that a task may require, and constantly evolves in response to feedback from employers and alumni.

Both programs also cover soft skills like effective communication, workflow management, product development and implementation, application deployment, and team dynamics.

Teaching Approach

Although the curricula are the same, the teaching approaches at MakerSquare and Hack Reactor are slightly different.

In the past, key lectures at MakerSquare were primarily delivered by video, says co-founder of Hack Reactor Shawn Drost, who is now COO at Reactor Core. A MakerSquare alumni who graduated in 2015 said, “85% of the time, they are video lectures. Most of these video lectures are pre-recorded lessons that were given at Hack Reactor.” MakerSquare co-founder Harsh Patel told Course Report that as of February 2016, MakerSquare now delivers key lectures live in-person, along with some supporting video lectures which have live follow-up Q&A sessions with instructors.

At Hack Reactor, students learn through a sequence of targeted lectures, structured assignments and collaborative projects. Students regularly work in pairs.

Reactor Core told Course Report that both Hack Reactor and MakerSquare use mostly live lectures and supplement learning with video lectures.

MakerSquare has smaller classes, with a maximum class size of 20 students, whereas Hack Reactor classes are between 30 and 35 students.

Culture at Hack Reactor vs. MakerSquare

Some students say the atmosphere is more “chill” at Makersquare. Makersquare graduate Ryan James said he chose Makersquare over Hack Reactor because it was more relaxed, with a chill vibe. Another MakerSquare graduate Jeff Louie said the environment at MakerSquare was both serious and relaxing, and that “during lunch time and at the end of the day, people would just hang out and talk or play ping pong and darts.”

Hack Reactor graduates regularly say the program is extremely intense. Graduate Austin Liu said the pace is really quick, and if you fall behind, you have to work even harder to catch up. Hack Reactor graduate Zach advised, “be prepared to work incredibly hard... The more effort you put in the better your results will be.”

Reactor Core Chief Research Officer Phillip Alexander told Course Report that Hack Reactor students are very driven, often staying up till 2am, hacking on intense and complex projects. Phillip says Hack Reactor is like an experimental testing ground for cutting edge education, so people who want to study in an unpolished, but innovative environment are suited to Hack Reactor.

Job Placement Rate & Hiring Network

Both Hack Reactor and MakerSquare are part of the Reactor Core Hiring Network, which has partnerships with over 300 companies including Microsoft, Intuit, Chase, and Slack.

Shawn Drost says: “All partner schools have identical job search support curriculum/process (but are administered by different people). The hiring days for all partner schools are run by the same team.”

MakerSquare claims to have a 96% job placement rate within three months of graduation, and average graduate salaries of $106,000 in San Francisco, $92,000 in Los Angeles, and $75,000 in Austin. MakerSquare hosts a Career Day at the end of every cohort, and provides ongoing graduate career support to help students get interviews with partner companies.

Hack Reactor claims to have a 99% job placement rate within three months of graduation, and an average graduate salary of $105,000. Hack Reactor Remote Beta job placement is 95%, with an average salary of $94,000.  

Realistically, each school likely has different reputations and hiring networks depending on the city. One MakerSquare graduate from San Francisco suggested in October 2015: “go to Hack Reactor over MakerSquare because even though they share the same curriculum, the job network is Hack Reactor’s and Hack Reactor has a much better reputation.” Another MakerSquare graduate disagreed, citing that “people ‘in the know’ realize the curriculum [at both schools] are the same and that attendance is really based off timing.”

Application, Interview, & Admissions Process

MakerSquare CEO Harsh Patel says both schools have the same admissions standards and the same programming challenge and technical interview.

If you’re applying directly through the MakerSquare website, you will complete the admissions challenge, then prepare for and complete a technical interview on Callbacks in JavaScript, composing and writing functions, and how you respond to learning new concepts. Interviews can be in person at one of MakerSquare’s locations, or via Skype.

If you apply directly through the Hack Reactor website, you will be prompted to complete a set of prep materials and the admissions challenge. The admissions challenge page welcomes you to the “Reactor Core admissions challenge, shared by Hack Reactor, MakerSquare and Telegraph Academy.” The admissions challenge covers JavaScript syntax, and problem solving. After the admissions challenge, at the end of the application, you are asked which of the Reactor Core schools you want to apply for out of MakerSquare, Telegraph Academy, Mobile Makers, Hack Reactor, and Hack Reactor Remote Beta. It says: “You can interview with more than one, but the processes, interviews, and decisions are separate for each school.”

Applicants then schedule a Hack Reactor technical interview which is a live coding session with a Hack Reactor mentor, and students need to be familiar with JavaScript objects, arrays and functions.

Reviews of MakerSquare vs. Hack Reactor

In the end, we can give you the facts, but scouring reviews is the best way to get a feel for each school. Here are some highlights:

MakerSquare

  • Graduate Ryan Hamblin said in March 2016: “Know that you will be discouraged, frustrated, and feel like you don't belong throughout the process. But after you get in and start learning, you'll understand quickly that you had just made the best decision of your life!”
  • Graduate Scott said in March 2016: “It was possibly the best 3 months of my life. I've never learned so much so fast, and the outcomes are real. Just about all of my cohort is employed.”
  • Graduate Travis said in November 2015: “I'd recommend MakerSquare to anyone with a passion for programming and who is serious about a career in software. It is not for everyone and was very trying at times but if you want to go to the best coding school in the Bay Area, MakerSquare is it.”

Hack Reactor

Hack Reactor vs. MakerSquare

  • MakerSquare graduate Mark said in March 2016: “The programs are pretty much identical so the difference really comes down to personality. If Hack Reactor is the Harvard of bootcamps then Makersquare is the Stanford – a little bit friendlier, more laid back, but still pretty intense. Pick the one that works best for your personality since ultimately what matters is whether you learn how to code and think like an engineer – literally nothing else matters."
  • MakerSquare graduate Jimmy D said in October 2015 at first he was scared that people would think he was a Hack Reactor reject, but that it actually doesn’t make a difference: “People ‘in the know’ realize the curriculums are the same and that attendance is really based off timing”.
  • MakerSquare graduate CJM said in January 2016: “I was originally between Hack Reactor and MakerSquare and decided on MakerSquare due to the smaller class sizes.”

 

More Reading

 

Read Hack Reactor reviews and MakerSquare reviews on their Course Report pages. And check out the Hack Reactor and MakerSquare websites.

About The Author

Imogen Crispe

Imogen Crispe

Imogen is a writer and content producer who loves exploring technology and education in her work. Her strong background in journalism, writing for newspapers and news websites, makes her a contributor with professionalism and integrity.

Also on Course Report

Get our FREE Ultimate Guide to Paying for a Bootcamp

By submitting this form, you agree to receive email marketing from Course Report.

Get Matched in Minutes

Just tell us who you are and what you’re searching for, we’ll handle the rest.

Match Me